Publication Ethics

Jurnal Edik Informatika (JEI) is a peer-reviewed journal. This statement explains the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the publishing action of articles in this journal, including authors, chief editors, Editorial Boards, peer reviewers and publishers. This statement is based on the Code of Conduct and COPE Practic Guidelines for Journal Editors (see below).

Guide to Ethics for Journal Publications

The publication of an article in the peer-reviewed JEI is an important building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. This is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of writers and institutions that support it. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody scientific methods. It is therefore important to agree on the expected ethical standards of conduct for all parties involved in publishing actions: authors, journal editors, peer reviewers, publishers and the public.


Publisher and Editor

The Informatics Education Study Program as the publisher of JEI undertakes the task of guardianship at all stages of publication very seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that ads, reprints or other commercial revenue have no impact or influence editorial decisions. In addition, the Informatics and Editorial Education Study Program will assist in communication with other journals and / or publishers that are useful and necessary.


Publication Decision: JEI's editor is responsible for determining which articles are submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance for the researcher and the reader should always encourage such a decision. Editors can be guided by journal editorial board policies and are limited by legal requirements as applicable in the future because of defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. Editors can talk with editors and other reviewers to make this decision.


Fair play: An editor at any time evaluates the manuscripts for their intellectual content irrespective of race, sex, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship or political philosophy of the authors.


Confidentiality: The editor and any editorial staff shall not disclose any information about manuscripts submitted to anyone other than potential authors, reviewers, potential reviewers, editorial advisers, and other publishers.


Disclosure and conflict of interest: Unpublished material disclosed in the submitted manuscript shall not be used in the research of its own editor without the written consent of the author.



Contribution to Editorial Decisions: Peer review helps editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with authors can also assist authors in improving this paper.


Accuracy: Any elected referee who feels ineligible to review research reported in a script or know that his short review will become unlikely to have to notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.


Confidentiality: Any manuscript received for review should be treated as a confidential document. They should not be indicated or discussed with anyone other than those authorized by the editor.


Standards of Objectivity: Review must be done objectively. The author's personal criticism is not right. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.


Recognition Source: The reviewer should identify relevant published works that have never been cited by the author. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument has been previously reported must be accompanied by relevant citations. A reviewer should also call the editor's attention to substantial or overlapping equality between the manuscript under consideration and other publication papers with personal knowledge.


Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Any information or privileged ideas obtained through peer review should be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. The reviewer should not regard manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest due to a relationship, relationship, or competitive, collaborative, or other relationship with any newspaper-related writer, company or institution.


Reporting standards: The original research report writer should present accurate employment reports and objective discussions on their significance. The underlying data should be represented accurately on paper. The paper should contain enough detail and referrals to allow others to replicate the work. False or intentionally inaccurate statements are unethical and unacceptable behavior.


Data and Retention Access: The author is required to provide raw data in connection with papers for editorial reviews, and shall be prepared to grant public access to such data (in accordance with the ALPSP-STM Statement of Data and Database), where practicable, and in any case shall be prepared for store the data for a reasonable time after publication.


Originality and Plagiarism: Authors must ensure that they have written the original work completely, and if the author has used the work and / or the words of others that have been quoted or quoted appropriately.


Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publications: A writer should not generally publish manuscripts that essentially describe the same research in more than one major journal or publication. Sending the same script to more than one journal simultaneously is unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior.


Recognition Source: True recognition of the work of others must always be given. The author should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the work reported.


Writing Papers: Authors should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, implementation, or interpretation of reported research. Anyone who has made a significant contribution should be registered as a coauthor. If there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they must be recognized or registered as contributors. The appropriate author must ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate coauthors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have reviewed and approved the final version of the paper and have approved the submission for publication.


Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: All authors shall disclose in their text any financial conflict of interest or other conflicts of interest that may be interpreted to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscripts. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.


Fundamental mistakes in published works: When a writer finds significant mistakes or inaccuracies in his or her own work, the writer's obligation to immediately notify the journal or publisher editors and work with the editor to retract or correct the paper.