IMPOLITENESS OF COLLEGE STUDENT SHORT MESSAGE SERVICE TOWARD THE LECTURER (KETIDAKSANTUNAN DALAM PESAN SINGKAT MAHASISWA KEPADA DOSEN)

Abstract view : 529 times
PDF - 61 times


Abstract


This study aims to describe and explain the strategy of dishonesty, politeness indicator, and factors used in short messages students to the lecturerin Dharma Andalas univeristy. This research uses qualitative descriptive analysis. The data of this research is the utterance that happened between student and lecturer. In collectingdata, this research used reference method. This method is followed by the technique of record. Data is done by recording a short message that goes to the lecturer's mobile phone. The method of data analysis used in this study is a method of technicalwith pragmatic, referential, and translational. The method of presentation of  thisresearch results isused formal and informal methods. The results of the data analysis showed that the strategy of impoliteness that commonly used by the students is bald on record impolitenes, followed by positive impoliteness and negative impoliteness. While the indicator of politeness is often used is to use the word sorry, please and should. Another factor that causes the most frequent of impoliteness is direct criticism with hard words.

Keywords


impoliteness, impoliteness strategy, short message, and context.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bousfield, Derek. 2008. Impoliteness in Struggle for Power. Bousfield, D & Locher (eds), M. Impoliteness in Language-Studies on its Interplay with Power and Practice. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.

Chaer, Abdul. 2010. Kesantunan Berbahasa. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2008. Reflection An Politeness, Relational Work and Power. In Bousfield, D & Loocher (eds). M. Impoliteness in Language-Studies on its Interplay with Power and Practice. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2005. “Impoliteness and Entertainment in The Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link” Journal of Politeness Research 1, 35-72.

Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Language and Power. England: Longman.

Fatimah, Nuraini, dkk. 2014. Strategi Ketidaksantunan Culpeper dalam Berbahasa Lisan di Sekolah. Prosiding Seminar nasionaL. Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah.

Fhitri, Widya. 2017. Kesantunan Permintaan :Interaksi Mahasiswa Dan Dosen. Jurnal Gramatika: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 3(1), 9-26.

Fitri, R., & Rahmat, W. 2017. Inclusion of Murder News in the Posmetro Padang Daily Newspaper: A Study of Critical Discourse Analysis. Humaniora, 8(4), 311-317.

Hymes, Dell. 1974. Foundation in Sociolinguistics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsyylvania Press.

Laksono, Kisyani. 2014. Ketidaksantunan Berbahasa Di Lingkungan Penndidikan dan Dampaknya dalam Pembentukan Karakter. Prosiding Seminar Nasional. Surabaya: Universitas Surabaya

Leech, GeoffreyN. 1982. Principle of Pragmatics. London: Longman.

Levinson, Stephen C. 2008. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Maksan, Marjusman. 1994. Ilmu Bahasa Edisi Kedua. Padang: IKIP Padang Press.

Mansor, Nor Sahilah, dkk. 2014. Ketidaksantunan Bahasa Sebagai Strategi Pujukan dalam Iklan Berbahasa Spanyol. Journal of Language Studies volume 14 (3). Malaysia: Universitas Putra malaysia.

Maryelliwati, Rahmat, W., & Kemal, E. 2018. A Reality Of Minangkabau Language And Literature And Its Transformation To A Creation Of Performance Works. Jurnal Gramatika: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 4(1), 62-70.

Oktavianus dan Ike Revita. 2013. Kesantunan dalam Bahasa Minangkabau. Padang: Minangkabau Press.

Pranowo. 2009. Berbahasa Secara Santun. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Rahardi, R. Kunjana. 2006. Dimensi-Dimensi Kebahasaan Anek Masalah Bahasa Indonesia Terkini. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Revita, dkk. 2015. ‘Dinamika Bahasa Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan: Analisis Pragmatic-Medis Women Trafficking’. Seminar International Conference on Linguistic Scientific Meeting. Bandung: UNPAD.

Revita, Ike. 2013. Pragmatik Kajian Tindak Tutur Permintaan Lintas Budaya. Padang: Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Andalas.

Sri Imelwaty, S. S., Hum, Y. M., & Wahyudi Rahmat, M. (2017). Variasi Sintaksis Bahasa Inggris Para Guru Bahasa Inggris di Kota Padang, Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Gramatika: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 3(2), 173-182.

Sudaryanto. 1993. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta

Wacana.

Wijayanto, Agus. 2014. Ketidaksantunan Berbahasa: Penggunaan Bahasa Kekerasan di Sinetron Bertema Kehidupan Remaja. Prosiding Seminar Nasional. Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah.

Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford university Press.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22202/jg.2018.v4i2.2666



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Statistik Pengunjung Jurnal Gramatika: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia