MAKNA TELEPON GENGGAM DI KALANGAN MAHASISWA STKIP PGRI SUMATERA BARAT

Abstract view : 451 times
PDF - 154 times


Abstract


This research was aimed at identifying hand phone utilization by students at STKIP PGRI
West Sumatera. This research was qualitative. The informant of this research were the
students who had hand phone who were selected through snowball sampling technique.
The data was collected through observation, interview, documentation, and the researcher
himself as an active participant. The data was analyzed by using techniques as suggested
by Miles and Huberman. The finding of this research showed that hand phone utilization
by the students beside it was aimed at its function, as a tool for communication, but it is
also to the owner prestige of him/her will be high. Hand phone symbolized one’s success,
modern, and high-tech minded. Hand phone had been a part of students life style today,
because they wouldn’t like being a part from old-fashioned class. By having hand phone,
students had high self-confidence. Beside that, they will be welcomed to the group of
those who had hand phone.


Keywords


Makna telepon genggam di kalangan mahasiswa

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bogdan, R. dan S.J Taylor, 1975. Introduction to Qualitative Methods.

New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Barnard, Malcom. 2006. Fashion sebagai Komunikasi “Cara Mengkomunikasikan

Identitas Sosial, Seksual, Kelas dan Benda”. Alih bahasa: Idi Subandy Ibrahim.

Bandung: Jala Sutra

Faisal, Sanafiah. 1990. Penelitian Kualitatif Dasar-Dasar dan Aplikasi.

Malang : Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Featherstone, M. 2001. Posmodernisme dan Budaya Konsumen

( terjemahan ). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Guy Daniel,"Mobile Manoeuvres", Communications International, October 1997

Jacob,T. 2001. Tahun-Tahun Yang Sulit, Mari Mencintai Indonesia,

Jakarta: Yayasan Obor.

Johnson,D.P. 1990. Teori Sosiologi Klasik dan Modern. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Kompas. 2002, “ MMS Teknologi Gaul Terkini”, 3 Agustus, hlm. 40.

-------------2002,“Sony Ericsson Bertekat Rebut Kembali Pasdar Ponsel Indonesia“, 3

Agustus . hlm. 40.

Komputer Aktif ,2002,“Ponsel Anda,Pribadi Anda“.No19.Januari.hlm. 56.

-------------------- , 2002, “ Kehalian dan Tukang ”, No. 20. Januari, hlm. 76.

Koentjaraningrat. 1980. Sejarah Teori Antropologi. Jakarta: Universitas

Indonesia.

-------------- 1992. Beberapa Pokok Antropologi Sosial. Jakarta: Dian Rakyat

-------------- 1996. Pengantar Antropologi I . Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

-------------- 1997. Pengantar Antropologi ( pokok-pokok etnografi II). Jakarta : Rineka

Cipta.

Lury.C. 1998. Budaya Konsumen, Jakarta: Yayasan Obor.

M.Poloma,Margaret (1999). Sosiologi Kontemporer. Jakarta: Depdikbud.

Moleong,J.Lexy.2000.Metodologi penelitian Kualitatif.Bandung: Remaja

Muhadjir, Noeng. 1990. Metodologi penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta : Rake Sarasin

Miles & Huberman. Tanpa tahun. Analisis data kualitatif. Terjemahan oleh Tjetjep

Rohendi Rosidi. 1982. Jakarta : Universitas Indonesia Press.

Muh.Muslih.2007.“Telepon Genggam Membantu atau Menggangu Siswa“Diambil dari

situs http://www.jiptumm.org.artikel.html.Tanggal 25 Januari 2007.

Parapak,J. 2000.“ Maraknya E .Commerce “,Dalam Ninok Laksono,

Indonesia abad XXI di Tengah Kepungan Perubahn Gobal.Jakatarta: Kompas

Media Nusantara. hlm. 259 -269.

Queeny (2007)“Arti dan makna (fungsi) telepon genggam (handphone)“ Diambil dari situs

http://www.jiptumm.org.artikel.html.Tanggal 23 Februari 2007.

Riztzer,G. 1992, Sosiologi Ilmu Pengetahuan Berpradigma Ganda,

Jakarta:Rajawali Pers.

Salim, A. 2002.Perubahan Sosial,Sketsa Teori dan Refleksi Metodologi, Kasus

Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Spradley, JP. 1980. Metode Etnografi. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Sunarto,Kamanto.2000.Pengantar Sosiologi. Jakarta : Fakultas Ekonomi

Universitas Indonesia.

Seidman, I.E. 1991. Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A. Guide for

Researchs in Education and the Social Sciences New York: Teacher

College Press.

Soeprapto,Riyadi 2001. Interaksionisme Simbolik Perspektif Sosiologi Modern.

Yogyakarta: Averroes Press dan Pustaka Pelajar.

Selular, 2001. “ Yang Suka Gonta Ganti Ponsel”, No.12 Maret. hlm.18.

---------,2001.“Tujuh Larangan Berponsel Saat Nyetir”,No.16.Juli.hlm14.

---------, 2001. “ Horor di balik ponsel ”, No.16. Juli .hlm. 20-21

Sugiono. 1995. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.

Soerjono,Soekanto. 1990. Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta : Rajawali Press.

Triratnawati, Atik 2003. “ Aspek Simbolisme Telepon Genggam ” Artikel di Jurnal

Humaniora Volume XV, No. 1/2003.

Tilley,C. 2001.“Etnography and Material Culture “ dalam Atkinson. Et.al.

(eds.) Handbook of Etnography. London: Sage Publication.

Tren and Telecomunication, 2001. “Ponsel Bikin Sakaw ”, No. 02/1,Desember, hlm.8.

----------, 2001. “ Sst ... Ini Serius “, No.01/1 November.hlm. 8-9.

----------, 2001. “ Anda Termasuk Yang Mana”, No. 01/1 November. hlm. 11.

----------, 2001.“Bisnis Lewat SMS“,No.01/1.November, hlm. 17.

Wuradji. 1988. Sosiologi Pendidikan sebuah Pendekatan Sosiologi Antropologi. Jakarta:

Dirjen Dikti.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22202/jp.2010.v3i1.42



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Published by STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat