TYPES OF DIRECTIVE SPEECH ACTS USED BY FUTSAL COACH IN VAMOS ACADEMY PADANG

Abstract view : 57 times
PDF - 21 times


Abstract


This study aims to describe the types of directive speech acts used by futsal coach in Vamos Academy Padang. This research uses a descriptive qualitative approach. The researcher uses speech act theory proposed by Searle (1979) and speech act theory proposed by Kreidler (1998) in analyzing data. The data in this study are the utterances of coach toward the students which are contain the intention of directive. The data were collected using observation methods and recording techniques. The results showed that the coach used three types of directive speech acts in communicating with students when coaching in Vamos Academy Padang. The three types of directive speech acts are commands, requests and suggestions. From the three types of directive speech acts, command is the type of directive that is most often used by coach toward the students in Vamos Academy Padang with 59%. Furthermore, it is followed by request with 26% and suggestion with 15%. The use of dominant command by the coach toward students in Vamos Academy Padang is influenced by the participant context in the utterance where the coach is the coaching leader in the field who has the authority and responsibility for the success of the material given to students in the exercise.


Keywords


Types of Directives Speech Acts, Commands, Requests, Suggestions, Coach, Vamos Academy Padang.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arani, Shohreh Shahpouri. 2012. “A Study of Directive Speech Acts Used by Iranian Nursery School Children: The Impact of Context on Children’s Linguistic Choices”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature. ISSN 2200-3592 (Print), ISSN 2200-3452 (Online). Vol.1 No.5; September 2012 (Special Issue on General Linguistics).

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Edisi Revisi VI. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. London: Oxford University Press.

Bach, K & Robert M Harnish. 1979. Linguistics Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Djajasudarma, T. Fatimah. 2006. Metode Linguistik: Ancangan Metode Penelitian dan Kajian. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Elmita, Winda, dkk. 2013. “Tindak Tutur Direktif Guru Dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar di TK Nusa Indah Banuaran Padang”. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Vol. 1 No. 2 Maret 2013; Seri B 77-163.

Guba, Egon G. dan Lincoln, Yvonna S. 1981. Effective Evaluation. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher.

Kreidler, W. Charles. 1998. Introducing English Semantics. London and New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.

Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.

Levinson, S.C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: CU Press.

Lofland, John dan Lyn H. Lofland. 1984. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. Belmont, Cal: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Marhaento, Putut. 2010. “Interpersonal Relationship Management In Sport Coaching Process”. Jurnal Olahraga Prestasi. Volume 6, Nomor 1, Januari.

Moleong, Lexy J. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Edisi Revisi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Moeliono, Anton. 1992. Tata Bahasa Baku Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Perum Balai Pustaka.

Nadar, F. X. 2009. Pragmatik dan Penelitian Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Neuman, W. Lawrence. 2014. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. USA: Pearson Education Limited.

Nugroho, Septian Adi. 2016. Gaya Kepemimpinan Pelatih Terhadap Kualitas Permainan Sepak Bola. Skripsi. Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Pekik, Djoko Irianto. 2002. Dasar-dasar Kepelatihan. Yogyakarta: FIK UNY.

Ratna, Nyoman Kutha. 2012. Penelitian Sastra: Teori, Metode, dan Tekhnik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Revita, Ike. 2013. Pragmatik: Kajian Tindak Tutur Permintaan Lintas Bahasa. Padang: Universitas Andalas.

Revita, Ike. 2018. Sosiopragmatik: Teori dan Praktik. Padang: Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Andalas Padang.

Searle, J. R. 1979. Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sudaryanto. 2015. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press.

Sudaryanto. 1993. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.

Sumarti. 2016. Strategi Tindak Tutur Direktif Guru dan Responswarna Afektif Siswa: Kajian Pragmatik. ISSN 1412-565 X halaman 95-110. Diakses pada Tanggal 6 Mei 2016 dilaman http//scholar.google.co.id. Lampung: Universitas Lampung.

Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatics. Terjemahan. Indah Fajar Wahyuni. 2006. Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22202/tus.2020.v6i1.3786



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Flag Counter